You can run a git add (which adds it to the staging area), and then you commit the change. The only way to inform Git to keep a record of this file's history is to add the file to the list of tracked files. tracked-and-untracked-files-git/ which is the file I created for this article I'm writing. In my project, the only untracked file is data/articles/108. This means it will not keep a history of the changes in this file and the subsequent changes. This section shows the files in my project that Git does not track currently. This way, Git can keep track of the changes or commits related to this file, and you can revert to previous versions of the file. Tracked files are files that Git is aware of. staged-changes-in-git/index.md, and you see the state close to it which is modified. In my project, the only tracked file that has changed is data/articles/107. A change can be that the file was modified, renamed, or deleted. To remove directories, run git clean -f -d or git clean -fd. Clean Step - beware: this will delete files: Delete the files from the repository git clean -f. So Git knows that these files have changed since the last time they were committed. Step 1 is to show what will be deleted by using the -n option: Print out the list of files and directories which will be removed (dry run) git clean -n -d. These are tracked files-files Git has recorded a history of. We have the first section which is Changes not staged for commit. When I run git status in my project with this new file, here's what I get in the console:įrom this screenshot, you see we have two sections: "Changes not staged for commit" and "Untracked files" Tracked files While writing this article, I had to create a new file in my project. The reason for this is that this new file is untracked. So if you make changes, rename it, or delete it, Git would not be able to show the previous history of the file. At this point, Git does not have any information about this file. Let's say you have an existing Git project, and you create a new file with some changes. Git does not keep a record of the history of all your files until you tell it to. Git submodule foreach -recursive -quiet 'RESULT=$(git describe -broken -dirty -all)Įcho "- but at least one submodule is dirty.When using Git in your projects, you need to understand what tracked and untracked files are. # Bail out now, in case it is not safe to look for sub-modulesĮcho "Main repository is dirty - not checking any submodules." RESULT=$(git describe -broken -dirty -all) This requires a modern (version >= 3.x) of bash as I understand it, it also does not investigate untracked files - which is not unreasonable in my opinion (at least they shouldn't be clobbered if a difference branch is checked out!) - note that it only returns a zero exit status if everything is clean: #!/bin/bash How about using git describe -broken -dirty -all and checking the result to see if it ends in -dirty (or -broken) then, using the same thing on any submodules with git submodule foreach. The files, that are normally listed under Changes not staged for commit: when calling git status. If untracked files in the working directory are relevant, git status -porcelain is probably the best bet. I want to get a list of changed files of the current git-repo. Using this, we can check for unstaged changes with: git diff -exit-codeĪnd staged, but not committed changes with: git diff -cached -exit-codeĪlthough git diff can report on untracked files in submodules via appropriate arguments to -ignore-submodules, unfortunately it seems that there is no way to have it report on untracked files in the actual working directory. It's also worth noting that, although git status does not give meaningful exit code when the working directory is unclean, git diff provides the -exit-code option, which makes it behave similar to the diff utility, that is, exiting with status 1 when there were differences and 0 when none were found. To make this more robust against conditions which actually cause git status to fail without output to stdout, we can refine the check to: if output=$(git status -porcelain) & then # Working directory clean excluding untracked files If we do not care about untracked files in the working directory, we can use the -untracked-files=no option to disregard those: if then We can use empty output of git status -porcelain as an indicator that there are no changes to be committed: if then It does, however, provide the -porcelain option, which causes the output of git status -porcelain to be formatted in an easy-to-parse format for scripts, and will remain stable across Git versions and regardless of user configuration. Your file will be tracked but not committed. UVVs comment is on the right track, but unfortunately the return code of git status doesn't change when there are uncommitted changes. Commit all of the changes you want to commit and push to remote. There's no guarantee that the output will remain the same in future versions of Git or in differently configured environments. Parsing the output of git status is a bad idea because the output is intended to be human readable, not machine-readable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |